The Internal Revenue Service has given a last-minute holiday gift to sponsors of insured group health plans.  It announced delayed enforcement for the new nondiscrimination provisions applicable to insured group health plans under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010; together the “Health Care Reform Law”).

The Health Care Reform Law requires non-grandfathered insured group health plans to satisfy the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 105(h)(2), previously applicable only to self-funded group health plans.  Thus, the new law effectively prohibits non-grandfathered insured group health plans from favoring highly compensated individuals with respect to eligibility or benefits.  It further provides that rules “similar to” Code Section 105(h)(3), (4), and (8) would apply, but left it to the enforcement agencies (including IRS) to come up with  those rules.  Meanwhile, the Health Care Reform Law would require sponsors of noncompliant plans to pay a hefty excise tax ($100 per day per affected individual) beginning, for most, with the 2011 plan year.  This seemingly sounded a death knell for many executive medical arrangements and sent employers in search of alternative ways to meet contractual obligations and otherwise continue to provide desired benefits without running afoul of the new law. 

The IRS issued Notice 2001-11 on December 22, 2010, which provides relief from the excise tax applicable to the nondiscrimination provision.  As an added token of holiday spirit, the IRS suggested that the regulations, once issued, would not apply until the plan year beginning some period of time thereafter.

In the same notice, the IRS requested additional public comments on the application of the nondiscrimination rules to insured group health plans.  Comments must be submitted not later than March 11, 2011.  Regulations, therefore, are not expected until April or later.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding this and other workplace developments.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Joseph J. Lazzarotti Joseph J. Lazzarotti

Joseph J. Lazzarotti is a principal in the Tampa, Florida, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He founded and currently co-leads the firm’s Privacy, Data and Cybersecurity practice group, edits the firm’s Privacy Blog, and is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) with the…

Joseph J. Lazzarotti is a principal in the Tampa, Florida, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He founded and currently co-leads the firm’s Privacy, Data and Cybersecurity practice group, edits the firm’s Privacy Blog, and is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) with the International Association of Privacy Professionals. Trained as an employee benefits lawyer, focused on compliance, Joe also is a member of the firm’s Employee Benefits practice group.

In short, his practice focuses on the matrix of laws governing the privacy, security, and management of data, as well as the impact and regulation of social media. He also counsels companies on compliance, fiduciary, taxation, and administrative matters with respect to employee benefit plans.

Photo of Monique Warren Monique Warren

Monique Warren is a principal in the White Plains, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She counsels employers on employee benefits compliance and administrative matters, represents employers to government agencies, and prepares plan documents and related employee communications.

Monique’s expertise includes health…

Monique Warren is a principal in the White Plains, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She counsels employers on employee benefits compliance and administrative matters, represents employers to government agencies, and prepares plan documents and related employee communications.

Monique’s expertise includes health and welfare plans as well as retirement plans. She has extensive experience helping plan sponsors navigate COBRA, HIPAA, and other ERISA and Internal Revenue Code provisions and correct compliance issues. A significant part of her practice currently focuses on defending employers in federal investigations of their group health plans as well as assisting government contractors with fulfilling fringe benefit obligations. She also has extensive experience helping retirement plan sponsors comply with ERISA fiduciary requirements and the Code’s qualification requirements and correcting plan errors under the Department of Labor’s and Internal Revenue Service’s voluntary correction programs.